Aluminum coating of metal products for the trade · Georgia

Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta

Atlanta, GA · ~30 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aluminum coating of metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta: 5.4 TCR = 163% of Aluminum coating of metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta safety composite

Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.8

2016→2022

Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta injury rate improved

Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta's TCR fell 7.8 from 7.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.8 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=12.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 163% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/13
  • PHOTO Metal Coaters of Geo…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Metal Coaters of Georgia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta averages 5.4 TCR (163% of the Aluminum coating of metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=12.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta falls in its industry

646 Aluminum coating of metal prod establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 13 Aluminum coating of metal prod employers in Georgia.

Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta (30 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta
Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta (30 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Max Coating, Inc. Atlanta has fewer employees than the Aluminum coating of metal products for t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.9 6.9 2 0 0
2020 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 12.7 8.5 3 0 0
2017 7.3 3.6 2 0 0
2016 7.8 7.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · GA · Atlanta

646 Aluminum coating of metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Metal Coaters of Georgia 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crystal Finishing Systems - Schofield 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ranews AIC Waterloo 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR R & R Powder Coating, Inc. 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Forsyth Hatchery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coffee Cotton Gin Co., Inc 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Albany Green Energy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Americus Operating 1020 Southerfield Road Americus GA 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Fort Wayne 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Morries 394 Hyundai 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops #432 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops #713 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 41A District Court 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Covetrus-Elizabethtown 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE FBC Chemical Corp. Mars 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard By Marriott 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.