OFFICES OF PHYSICIANS (EXCEPT MENTAL HEALTH SPECIALISTS) · South Carolina

Maxwell Pointe Practices

Greenville, SC · ~66 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maxwell Pointe Practices runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical OFFICES OF PHYSICIANS (EXCEPT MENTAL HEALTH SPECIALISTS) workplace, earning a grade B.

Maxwell Pointe Practices: 2.7 TCR = 71% of OFFICES OF PHYSICIANS (EXCEPT MENTAL HEALTH SPECIALISTS) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maxwell Pointe Practices safety composite

Maxwell Pointe Practices scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Maxwell Pointe Practices: 0.0 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Maxwell Pointe Practices's TCR rose 5.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 5.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/64
  • PHOTO Beachcliff Family Me…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beachcliff Family Medicine (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Maxwell Pointe Practices in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maxwell Pointe Practices averages 2.7 TCR (71% of the OFFICES OF PHYSICIANS (EXCEPT MENTAL HEALTH SPECIALISTS) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maxwell Pointe Practices TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=5.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Maxwell Pointe Practices falls in its industry

2,836 OFFICES OF PHYSICIANS (EXCEPT establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 64 OFFICES OF PHYSICIANS (EXCEPT employers in South Carolina.

Maxwell Pointe Practices (66 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Maxwell Pointe Practices
Maxwell Pointe Practices (66 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Maxwell Pointe Practices has more employees than the OFFICES OF PHYSICIANS (EXCEPT MENTAL HEA median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.5 0.0 3 0 0
2019 3.5 0.0 0 2 0
2018 1.8 0.0 0 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · SC · Greenville

2,836 OFFICES OF PHYSICIANS (EXCEPT MENTAL HEALTH SPECIALISTS) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beachcliff Family Medicine 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 777 Larkfield Road 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Borland Groover Holdings - Jacksonville Center of Endoscopy SS and Admin 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR St Louis Park 5400 Excelsior 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE NORTHERN POWER DELIVERY 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Operations Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridgestone ORR 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sumter Coatings 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Superior Steel Inc 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - San Antonio Lab 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MO KirkJami 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ottawa 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Windward Gardens 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6396-Elms Retirement Village 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Health VNS MSK 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.