Distribution equipment, electrical, merchant wholesalers · South Carolina

Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston

Charleston, SC · ~19 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution equipment, electrical, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston: 1.8 TCR = 81% of Distribution equipment, electrical, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston safety composite

Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2016→2020

Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston injury rate improved

Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston's TCR fell 7.1 from 7.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423610 · Charleston, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.8 · 81% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/18
  • PHOTO ELK GROVE DC IL
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ELK GROVE DC IL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston averages 1.8 TCR (81% of the Distribution equipment, electrical, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston falls in its industry

1,190 Distribution equipment, electr establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 18 Distribution equipment, electr employers in South Carolina.

Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston (19 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston
Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston (19 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Charleston has fewer employees than the Distribution equipment, electrical, merc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.1 7.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423610 · SC · Charleston

1,190 Distribution equipment, electrical, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 341 employers in Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ELK GROVE DC IL 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kendall Electric - EGRS 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buckles-Smith San Leandro 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HWC PHL Regional Distribution Center 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE M. B. Kahn Metro WWTP 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ascend 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florence Concrete Products, Inc. Field 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Heating & Cooling 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University Hospital Authority 8,204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University of South Carolina 5,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC-03 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1,790 FTE
NAT-TCR Williamson Street Grocery Cooperative East 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Amalur, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Berger Rental Communities- Corporate Office 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Component Assembly Systems New Jersey 1.8 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.