Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Minnesota

Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter

St Peter, MN · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade C.

Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter: 3.4 TCR = 89% of Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter safety composite

Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter: 0.0 → 6.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.02× in 2019

Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter's TCR rose 6.9 from 0.0 in 2017 to 6.9 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · St Peter, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 89% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #178/419
  • PHOTO Sutter Valley Medica…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30455) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter averages 3.4 TCR (89% of the Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=6.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter falls in its industry

2,836 Family physicians' offices (e. establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #178 safest of 419 Family physicians' offices (e. employers in Minnesota.

Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter (32 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter
Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter (32 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Mayo Clinic Health System-St Peter has fewer employees than the Family physicians' offices (e.g., center median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.9 3.5 2 0 0
2018 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MN · St Peter

2,836 Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 5 employers in St Peter, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sutter Valley Medical Foundation (30455) 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PMG-Cedar Multispecialty 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 440 East Main Street 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primary Care Cabot Drive 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE MN Farm 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz SE Office 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Bridge Combined Cycle 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steele Waseca Coop Electric 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3331 FAMILY FRESH MARKET (ST PETER, MN) 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shopko Hometown #611 (St Peter, MN) 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Plains Dairy 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pioneer Bank St Peter 23 FTE
NAT-TCR 1855-WIMIL35 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 392 - Severna Park 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR KWF GA Cumming HomeStore 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company-Midwest, LLC 629W-1C-R1 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Concrete Enterprises Inc 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Arthritis Care LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE QSI Wilkesboro 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE CN - Indian Valley 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.