Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · Kentucky

Mayo Underwood Building

Frankfort, KY · ~400 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mayo Underwood Building runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade A.

Mayo Underwood Building: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mayo Underwood Building safety composite

Mayo Underwood Building scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mayo Underwood Building: 0.0 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.4× in 2024

Mayo Underwood Building's TCR rose 1.5 from 0.0 in 2020 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Frankfort, KY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #3/24
  • PHOTO County of Sibley
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~400 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: County of Sibley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Mayo Underwood Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mayo Underwood Building averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mayo Underwood Building TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.2

Where Mayo Underwood Building falls in its industry

1,010 Executive offices, federal, st establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 24 Executive offices, federal, st employers in Kentucky.

Mayo Underwood Building (400 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mayo Underwood Building
Mayo Underwood Building (400 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Mayo Underwood Building has more employees than the Executive offices, federal, state, and l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 0.4 5 2 0
2023 2.1 0.4 6 5 0
2022 1.2 0.0 4 0 0
2021 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · KY · Frankfort

1,010 Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 104 employers in Frankfort, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR County of Sibley 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meeker County Highway 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Le Sueur County 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carroll County Courthouse 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mizkan America - Owensboro 400 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayfield Consumer Products 400 FTE
STATE-SIZE L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. - Florence Manufacturing 399 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5236 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR KYTC Central Office 945 FTE
CITY-NEAR Human Resource Bldg 892 FTE
CITY-NEAR Montaplast of North America Inc 784 FTE
CITY-NEAR EECSOWER 754 FTE
NAT-TCR 060-Angel Fire 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CKS Purdue 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Applied Research Laboratory 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health - Charlotte NC DC 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE West Tennessee Healthcare Dyersburg Hospital 400 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodland Park Zoological Society 400 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1832 - Blaine 400 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospitals of San Antonio 400 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.