Property managers' offices, residential real estate · Minnesota

MBG Property Management, Inc.

Minneapolis, MN · ~76 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MBG Property Management, Inc. runs at 659% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Property managers' offices, residential real estate workplace, earning a grade F.

MBG Property Management, Inc.: 9.2 TCR = 659% of Property managers' offices, residential real estate BLS 1.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MBG Property Management, Inc. safety composite

MBG Property Management, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2018→2022

MBG Property Management, Inc. injury rate improved

MBG Property Management, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.6 from 7.6 in 2018 to 6.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.6 · 2021=13.9 · 2022=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 659% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #21/26
  • PHOTO Independence Village…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Independence Village of Grand Ledge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

MBG Property Management, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MBG Property Management, Inc. averages 9.2 TCR (659% of the Property managers' offices, residential real estate BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MBG Property Management, Inc. TCR series: 2018=7.6 · 2021=13.9 · 2022=6.1 · BLS 1.4

Where MBG Property Management, Inc. falls in its industry

500 Property managers' offices, re establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 26 Property managers' offices, re employers in Minnesota.

MBG Property Management, Inc. (76 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate MBG Property Management, Inc.
MBG Property Management, Inc. (76 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

MBG Property Management, Inc. has more employees than the Property managers' offices, residential median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.1 6.1 4 0 0
2021 13.9 8.7 8 0 0
2018 7.6 1.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · MN · Minneapolis

500 Property managers' offices, residential real estate employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Independence Village of Grand Ledge 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Retreat at Mesa Hills 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meadow Lane Assisted Living & Memory Care 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Management Group Inc. 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Twin City Framers 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fireside Hearth n Home Roseville 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schoenfelder Renovations 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridley Inc. 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR 4795-EA-CMH-COLUMBUS-CMH-TRML 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0019-0018-02528 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-00132 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-01303 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Specific Systems 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Star Printing 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4054-ABS-0020-0022-02798 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4054-ABS-0005-0004-02812 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.