Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Tennessee

McArthur Manor Assisted Living

Manchester, TN · ~40 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McArthur Manor Assisted Living runs at 656% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

McArthur Manor Assisted Living: 24.9 TCR = 656% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McArthur Manor Assisted Living safety composite

McArthur Manor Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.8

2021→2024

McArthur Manor Assisted Living injury rate improved

McArthur Manor Assisted Living's TCR fell 20.8 from 33.2 in 2021 to 12.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 33.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=33.2 · 2023=29.2 · 2024=12.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Manchester, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 24.9 · 656% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #100/100
  • PHOTO Edgewood Brookings
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edgewood Brookings (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

McArthur Manor Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McArthur Manor Assisted Living averages 24.9 TCR (656% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McArthur Manor Assisted Living TCR series: 2021=33.2 · 2023=29.2 · 2024=12.4 · BLS 3.8

Where McArthur Manor Assisted Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #100 safest of 100 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Tennessee.

McArthur Manor Assisted Living (40 employees, TCR 24.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate McArthur Manor Assisted Living
McArthur Manor Assisted Living (40 employees, TCR 24.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

McArthur Manor Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.4 0.0 3 1 0
2023 29.2 23.3 2 3 0
2021 33.2 33.2 0 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TN · Manchester

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 43 employers in Manchester, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Brookings 24.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Almond Heights Senior Living 25.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6109 24.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkersburg Health Partners 24.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Moseley Bros. 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2022 Milan Public Utilities 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milan Department of Public Utilities 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE MEC NEWLAND BRANCH 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manchester / Smyrna 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Viam Manufacturing, Inc. 523 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Cheese Company, Inc. - Manchester 475 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Cheese of Tennessee, Inc. 361 FTE
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 043 24.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Allina Health Emergency Medical Services Buffalo 24.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Happy Travels Delivery 24.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Waterview Pines 24.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Top Seedz LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Charlottesville - Parks 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rbs - Lakeland 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Harrisburg 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.