Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) · North Carolina

MCAS Cherry Point

Cherry Point, NC · ~41 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MCAS Cherry Point runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) workplace, earning a grade D.

MCAS Cherry Point: 5.7 TCR = 150% of Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MCAS Cherry Point safety composite

MCAS Cherry Point scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

MCAS Cherry Point: 8.6 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.27× in 2021

MCAS Cherry Point's TCR rose 1.1 from 8.6 in 2016 to 9.7 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Cherry Point, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 150% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #29/38
  • PHOTO Posey County Rehabil…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Posey County Rehabilitation Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

MCAS Cherry Point in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MCAS Cherry Point averages 5.7 TCR (150% of the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MCAS Cherry Point TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=9.7 · BLS 3.8

Where MCAS Cherry Point falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or h establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 38 Vocational rehabilitation or h employers in North Carolina.

MCAS Cherry Point (41 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate MCAS Cherry Point
MCAS Cherry Point (41 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

MCAS Cherry Point has fewer employees than the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitatio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.7 7.3 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2018 4.9 4.9 2 0 0
2016 8.6 6.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · NC · Cherry Point

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 6 employers in Cherry Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Posey County Rehabilitation Services 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR VALLEYLIFE 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allentown Lehigh Street ( Administration Offices, Business Services, Mission Services) 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodwill Crystal Lake 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jeff Barnes LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sandhill Turf 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewiston NC Operation 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hendersonville Operations Center 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT USMCE MH 3451 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCAS Cherry Point (201) 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT USMC-E MH 3451 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cherry Point, NC 25 FTE
NAT-TCR Bayamon Betances 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Medical Equipment and Supply 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brunswick MFG 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Auberge at Valley Ranch 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE International Paper Recycling - Beaverton 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE ISD 317 District Wide 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson, MS Office 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jet Edge Acquisition, LLC 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.