Foundries, steel (except investment) · Pennsylvania

McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA

Pittsburgh, PA · ~326 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Foundries, steel (except investment) workplace, earning a grade D.

McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA: 4.5 TCR = 135% of Foundries, steel (except investment) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA safety composite

McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2018

McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA injury rate improved

McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA's TCR fell 1.1 from 5.3 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.3 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331513 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 135% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #2/13
  • PHOTO McConway & Torley, L…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~326 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: McConway & Torley, LLC (Arcosa, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA averages 4.5 TCR (135% of the Foundries, steel (except investment) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA falls in its industry

94 Foundries, steel (except inves establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 13 Foundries, steel (except inves employers in Pennsylvania.

McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA (326 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 78 employees and a TCR of 7.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA
McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA (326 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 78 employees and a TCR of 7.3

McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA has more employees than the Foundries, steel (except investment) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.2 2.2 15 0 0
2017 3.8 2.1 13 0 0
2016 5.3 4.2 18 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331513 · PA · Pittsburgh

94 Foundries, steel (except investment) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR McConway & Torley, LLC (Arcosa, Inc 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amsted Rail Company Inc 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stainless Foundry and Engineering inc 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern Stainless Corporation 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Haines & Kibblehouse, Inc. 326 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hefty Business Unit - Tamaqua, Pennsylvania 326 FTE
STATE-SIZE NEFC_Procter&Gamble 326 FTE
STATE-SIZE PASCN - SCRANTON GLOBAL BUSINESS SERVICES - GBS 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Heraeus Precious Metals North America Daychem, LLC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Maysville (Kymay) 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus (Ohcls) 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hill Country Care 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pacific Building (Wapac) 326 FTE
NAT-SIZE Republic National Distributing Company 13 326 FTE
NAT-SIZE Publics Work 326 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Mary WIC Site 326 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.