Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing · Alabama

McIntosh Distribution

Mcintosh, AL · ~61 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McIntosh Distribution runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

McIntosh Distribution: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McIntosh Distribution safety composite

McIntosh Distribution scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

McIntosh Distribution: 0.0 → 1.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.19× in 2024

McIntosh Distribution's TCR rose 1.1 from 0.0 in 2020 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325120 · Mcintosh, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO Chattanooga ASU
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chattanooga ASU (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

McIntosh Distribution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McIntosh Distribution averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McIntosh Distribution TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where McIntosh Distribution falls in its industry

295 Gases, industrial (i.e., compr establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Gases, industrial (i.e., compr employers in Alabama.

McIntosh Distribution (61 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate McIntosh Distribution
McIntosh Distribution (61 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

McIntosh Distribution has more employees than the Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liq median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2021 2.4 2.4 1 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325120 · AL · Mcintosh

295 Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 17 employers in Mcintosh, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chattanooga ASU 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linde - Kittery 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Del City #118 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linde Claremore 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods Crossville Hatchery 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capstone Building Corp. Office 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Legacy Equipment 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barlovento, LLC 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR BASF Corporation - McIntosh Site 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olin Corporation - McIntosh Plant 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huntsman Advanced Materials 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR McIntosh 121 FTE
NAT-TCR Allegheny Construction Specialties 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Maxwell Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Coherent Inc. Santa Clara 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR KWFC 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Industries-Sharon 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Muncie Aviation Company 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Cloud Auto Center, LLC 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Andersons Marathon Holdings LLC - Greenville 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.