Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Connecticut

McLean Affiliates

Simsbury, CT · ~339 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McLean Affiliates runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade C.

McLean Affiliates: 6.0 TCR = 93% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McLean Affiliates safety composite

McLean Affiliates scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2024

McLean Affiliates injury rate improved

McLean Affiliates's TCR fell 3.4 from 7.7 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.7 · 2017=7.0 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=10.5 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Simsbury, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.0 · 93% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #48/258
  • PHOTO Miller's Merry Manor
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 104 inj
  • SIZE ~339 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Miller's Merry Manor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

McLean Affiliates in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McLean Affiliates averages 6.0 TCR (93% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McLean Affiliates TCR series: 2016=7.7 · 2017=7 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=4 · 2020=10.5 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 6.5

Where McLean Affiliates falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 258 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Connecticut.

McLean Affiliates (339 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate McLean Affiliates
McLean Affiliates (339 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

McLean Affiliates has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 1.9 9 0 0
2023 6.2 4.4 13 1 0
2022 6.5 4.8 11 4 0
2021 3.4 2.7 7 2 0
2020 10.5 10.5 7 21 0
2019 4.0 3.7 11 0 0
2018 4.5 3.3 11 0 0
2017 7.0 6.2 17 0 0
2016 7.7 6.9 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CT · Simsbury

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 21 employers in Simsbury, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Miller's Merry Manor 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burlingame LTC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookside Healthcare 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kenton Nursing and Rehab Center 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Community Systems, Inc 339 FTE
STATE-SIZE Police 339 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ahlstrom Nonwovens LLC 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE TTM Technologies 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR EBAD-SY 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dyno Nobel Simsbury, CT 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR 100607 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR STOP & SHOP 100607 136 FTE
NAT-TCR MedVet Cincinnati 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aldercrest Health & Rehab 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohio Crankshaft Company 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GoodKind Hospitality, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Morrison 339 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buncombe County-Administration 339 FTE
NAT-SIZE PEORIA 339 FTE
NAT-SIZE SRG Global, INC 339 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.