Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard · New Jersey

McLean Packaging

Pennsauken, NJ · ~97 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McLean Packaging runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

McLean Packaging: 2.7 TCR = 82% of Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McLean Packaging safety composite

McLean Packaging scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

McLean Packaging injury rate improved

McLean Packaging's TCR fell 0.4 from 3.0 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Pennsauken, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #12/21
  • PHOTO NC030 Asheboro Conta…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NC030 Asheboro Container (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

McLean Packaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McLean Packaging averages 2.7 TCR (82% of the Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McLean Packaging TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where McLean Packaging falls in its industry

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugate establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 21 Shipping containers, corrugate employers in New Jersey.

McLean Packaging (97 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate McLean Packaging
McLean Packaging (97 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

McLean Packaging has fewer employees than the Shipping containers, corrugated, made fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 3 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 2.7 1.8 3 0 0
2020 3.1 2.1 3 0 0
2019 5.2 2.6 6 0 0
2018 3.3 1.7 4 0 0
2017 1.7 0.9 2 0 0
2016 3.0 3.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · NJ · Pennsauken

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 110 employers in Pennsauken, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NC030 Asheboro Container 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Packaging - San Diego, CA 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wausau Container Division 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper-Eighty Four Container 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE NJ Haworth 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donnelly Industries Inc. 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Infrastructure Repair Service 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mile Square Roofing Co,. Inc. 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR J&J Snack Foods 528 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1964-00010110 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR AVL - NJ Headquarters 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR DIY - NJ Headquarters 298 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 050 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mizkan America 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Athens 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pentastar Aviation, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marmon Aerospace and Defense 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE US Foods Bismarck 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home of the Good Shepherd 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crenshaw Nursing Home 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.