Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Oregon

McLoughlin Place

Oregon City, OR · ~82 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McLoughlin Place runs at 260% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

McLoughlin Place: 9.9 TCR = 260% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McLoughlin Place safety composite

McLoughlin Place scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2016→2023

McLoughlin Place injury rate improved

McLoughlin Place's TCR fell 5.9 from 16.7 in 2016 to 10.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 16.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.7 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=10.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Oregon City, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 260% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #63/92
  • PHOTO Stratford Court of P…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stratford Court of Palm Harbor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

McLoughlin Place in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McLoughlin Place averages 9.9 TCR (260% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McLoughlin Place TCR series: 2016=16.7 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=10.8 · BLS 3.8

Where McLoughlin Place falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 92 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

McLoughlin Place (82 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate McLoughlin Place
McLoughlin Place (82 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

McLoughlin Place has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.8 4.0 8 0 0
2022 8.8 8.8 6 0 0
2021 8.4 7.0 5 1 0
2020 6.5 6.5 5 0 0
2019 8.1 2.7 6 0 0
2016 16.7 6.7 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OR · Oregon City

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 64 employers in Oregon City, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stratford Court of Palm Harbor 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRANDYWINE LIVING @ THE SYCAMORE 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Granite Farms Estates 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village Buffalo Grove 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE BIOMASS ONE 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oregon City Line Ops 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerald People's Utility District 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dallas Glass 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clackamas County 2,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clackamas Community College 840 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR278 PROVIDENCE WILLAMETTE FALLS MEDICAL CTR 752 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00242 384 FTE
NAT-TCR The Original Mattress Factory Charlotte 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Hill Country Club 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Roger Street Facility 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wick Buildings Inc 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stewart & Stevenson - Dallas Branch 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dorado Services, Inc. 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Glenview Fire Department 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Associated Spring Raymond - Maumee 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.