Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation · Nebraska

McNeil Industrial, Inc.

Omaha, NE · ~93 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McNeil Industrial, Inc. runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation workplace, earning a grade A.

McNeil Industrial, Inc.: 0.8 TCR = 29% of Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McNeil Industrial, Inc. safety composite

McNeil Industrial, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2019→2022

McNeil Industrial, Inc. injury rate improved

McNeil Industrial, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.7 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Omaha, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/49
  • PHOTO DePue Mechanical, Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DePue Mechanical, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

McNeil Industrial, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McNeil Industrial, Inc. averages 0.8 TCR (29% of the Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McNeil Industrial, Inc. TCR series: 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where McNeil Industrial, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Refrigeration system (e.g., co establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 49 Refrigeration system (e.g., co employers in Nebraska.

McNeil Industrial, Inc. (93 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate McNeil Industrial, Inc.
McNeil Industrial, Inc. (93 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

McNeil Industrial, Inc. has more employees than the Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2019 1.7 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · NE · Omaha

5,793 Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DePue Mechanical, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Mechanical Services, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cayce Company, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Star Service, Inc. 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ronco Construction 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Watts Electric Company 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norfolk Crush 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE 43271P - OMAHA PEC 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR CMC Materials - Fort Worth 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR DeKalb, IL - CN1 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Building the Carolinas, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR NAES : OM - New Athens 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bobrick Washroom Equipment Inc. 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Albany Care Center 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8971-Chevron Oronite 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.