Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park

Menlo Park, CA · ~21 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park: 8.5 TCR = 223% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park safety composite

Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.8

2019→2023

Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park injury rate improved

Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park's TCR fell 15.8 from 21.8 in 2019 to 6.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 21.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=21.8 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Menlo Park, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 223% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #98/216
  • PHOTO Summit Place of Ande…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Summit Place of Anderson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park averages 8.5 TCR (223% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park TCR series: 2019=21.8 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=0 · 2023=6 · BLS 3.8

Where Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #98 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park (21 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park
Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park (21 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.0 6.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 21.8 21.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Menlo Park

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 62 employers in Menlo Park, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Summit Place of Anderson 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHS - Fairway Knoll 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Penney Retirement Community, Inc. 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worthington Bickford 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Menlo Park 628 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rudolph and Sletten 516 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosewood Sand Hill 430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Care Indeed Inc 381 FTE
NAT-TCR Iowa Aluminum, Inc 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Voeller Mixers, inc. 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lowell C Hagen Trucking, Inc. 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR US Foods Indianapolis 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Craftsmen Utility Trailer-Sikeston 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Engineering Company 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant MI 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 51 Van Buren 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.