Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Meadow Oaks of Roseville

Name: Meadow Oaks of Roseville Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Roseville, CA · ~86 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.7
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meadow Oaks of Roseville runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Meadow Oaks of Roseville: 3.7 TCR = 97% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meadow Oaks of Roseville safety composite

Meadow Oaks of Roseville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Meadow Oaks of Roseville: 3.4 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Meadow Oaks of Roseville's TCR rose 0.8 from 3.4 in 2019 to 4.2 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Roseville, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 97% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #65/635
PHOTO Mary Schwartz Summit
BOOK 3y book
INJ 8 inj
SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mary Schwartz Summit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.7
Mary Schwartz

3.7
Malbis ALF, LL

3.7
63163 SUNRISE

3.7
Citrus Hills A

3.7

What this shows Meadow Oaks of Roseville averages 3.7 TCR (97% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Meadow Oaks of Roseville TCR series: 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=4.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Meadow Oaks of Roseville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Meadow Oaks of Roseville (86 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Meadow Oaks of Roseville has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2021	4.2	0.0	3
2020	3.4	2.6	4
2019	3.4	0.0	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Roseville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Mary Schwartz Summit	SEATTLE, WA	3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Malbis ALF, LLC	DAPHNE, AL	3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	63163 SUNRISE OF NORTH LYNBROOK	LYNBROOK, NY	3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Citrus Hills Assisted Living	ORANGE, CA	3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	MALAGA HARVEST SHOP	ARVIN	86 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Muller Ranch, LLC	WOODLAND	86 FTE
STATE-SIZE	OXNARD TERRACE	OXNARD	86 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Mushroom Farms	WATSONVILLE	86 FTE
CITY-NEAR	2032-02121801	Roseville	4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003)	Roseville	4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR	0206-02621801	Roseville	3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001)	Roseville	3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR	Carthage SNF, LP	Carthage, TX	3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	US7141 Binghamton	Kirkwood, NY	3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	NEMA San Francisco	San Francisco, FL	3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sam's Xpress Car Wash 323	Indian Trail, NC	3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Mazda of Ocala	Ocala, FL	86 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Counseling and Consultation Services, Inc.	Limestone, TN	86 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Pall Hauppuage	Hauppauge, NY	86 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Mill Creek Truss LLC	Halstead, KS	86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.