Skilled nursing facilities · Indiana

Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation

Salem, IN · ~85 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation: 9.0 TCR = 138% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation safety composite

Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation: 5.5 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 14.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.3× in 2021

Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation's TCR rose 3.8 from 5.5 in 2016 to 9.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Salem, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.0 · 138% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #449/640
  • PHOTO 3 G Operating Co., L…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 3 G Operating Co., LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation averages 9.0 TCR (138% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=14.6 · 2018=11.9 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=9.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #449 safest of 640 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Indiana.

Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation (85 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation
Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation (85 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Meadow View Health and Rehabilitation has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.3 2.7 7 0 0
2020 5.3 2.6 4 0 0
2019 7.1 5.7 5 0 0
2018 11.9 11.9 8 0 0
2017 14.6 13.1 10 0 0
2016 5.5 5.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · IN · Salem

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 24 employers in Salem, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 3 G Operating Co., LLC. 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LP Louisville Herr Lane, LLC--Jefferson Place 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkway Center 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brighton Rehab and Wellness 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hendricks Power Headquarters 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE 405-NiSource-South Bend IN-Operating HQ 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE 530-NiSource-Goshen IN-Operating HQ 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fredericks Inc 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Sinter Metals - Salem, Indiana 490 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kimball Salem 385 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Sinter Metals 360 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8027611-GKN 339 FTE
NAT-TCR Oklahoma Tire Recyclers LLC 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreens of Fargo 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Fredericksburg 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SCHOTT North America Electronic Packaging 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE ARCH Tuscaloosa 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE CS - Holley Performance Products 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dot's Velva 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bowie Texas 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.