Skilled nursing facilities · Tennessee

Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center

Pulaski, TN · ~70 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center: 10.1 TCR = 156% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center: 5.0 → 7.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 17.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.74× in 2023

Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 2.5 from 5.0 in 2016 to 7.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 17.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pulaski, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.1 · 156% of ind

  • DART 7.5 DART
  • RANK #220/278
  • PHOTO Crowne Health Care o…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crowne Health Care of Citronelle (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center averages 10.1 TCR (156% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=16.1 · 2018=17.9 · 2019=9 · 2020=15.8 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=7.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #220 safest of 278 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Tennessee.

Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center (70 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center
Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center (70 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Meadowbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.5 7.5 5 0 0
2022 5.7 1.9 3 0 0
2021 4.1 4.1 2 0 0
2020 15.8 14.1 9 0 0
2019 9.0 9.0 5 0 0
2018 17.9 17.9 10 0 0
2017 16.1 10.7 12 0 0
2016 5.0 3.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TN · Pulaski

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 38 employers in Pulaski, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crowne Health Care of Citronelle 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAUREL WELLNESS AND NURSING CENTER 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colonial Haven 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-343 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE PCUD 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Commercial Painting Inc 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogers Group, Inc 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE JARRETT FIRE PROTECTION, LLC 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR PULASKI PLANT 611 FTE
CITY-NEAR 35370 - PULASKI PLANT 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR SaarGummi Tennessee Inc. 426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adient, Pulaski TN 299 FTE
NAT-TCR Downey Base - Bld: 0360 - 15 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilchrist Metal Fabricating 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR New Holland F/P Plant 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Howard Farmers Coop 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE *Willowcrest 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE EAC 6280 North East Paving 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Busch's Inc 1205 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canoga Base - Bld: 0441 - 15 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.