Laundry services, linen supply · Connecticut

Med Apparel Services CT

Middlebury, CT · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Med Apparel Services CT runs at 239% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Laundry services, linen supply workplace, earning a grade F.

Med Apparel Services CT: 5.0 TCR = 239% of Laundry services, linen supply BLS 2.1 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Med Apparel Services CT safety composite

Med Apparel Services CT scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2024

Med Apparel Services CT injury rate improved

Med Apparel Services CT's TCR fell 3.2 from 9.7 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=5.6 · 2024=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 812331 · Middlebury, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.0 · 239% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #1/9
  • PHOTO NOVO Health Services…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NOVO Health Services - Atlanta (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Med Apparel Services CT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Med Apparel Services CT averages 5.0 TCR (239% of the Laundry services, linen supply BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Med Apparel Services CT TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=5.6 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 2.1

Where Med Apparel Services CT falls in its industry

334 Laundry services, linen supply establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 9 Laundry services, linen supply employers in Connecticut.

Med Apparel Services CT (32 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Med Apparel Services CT
Med Apparel Services CT (32 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Med Apparel Services CT has fewer employees than the Laundry services, linen supply median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 6.5 2 0 0
2023 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.8 2.9 2 0 0
2019 8.6 8.6 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.3 0.0 2 0 0
2016 9.7 6.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

812331 · CT · Middlebury

334 Laundry services, linen supply employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 13 employers in Middlebury, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NOVO Health Services - Atlanta 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Healthcare Linen Management 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phelps Uniform Services 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HandCraft Linen Services - Healthcare HP 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Montville Power LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobs - WATERBURY - OMI 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Moriarty & Associates, Inc. (CT) 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Bridge Company - 422110 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alliance Medical Group 355 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Middlebury 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paul Dinto Electrical Contractors--Main 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paul Dinto Electrical Contractors, Inc. 140 FTE
NAT-TCR Construction Company 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 021 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mele & Mele & Sons, Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County d/b/a Eskenazi Health 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Empire Truck Sales - Pensacola 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE AIRCRAFT GEAR CORPORATION - Plant 2 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ray Black & Son, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whit-Log Inc. 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.