Home care of elderly, medical · Kentucky

Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care

Bowling Green, KY · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.7
Avg TCR
5.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care runs at 360% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Home care of elderly, medical workplace, earning a grade F.

Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care: 18.7 TCR = 360% of Home care of elderly, medical BLS 5.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care safety composite

Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.2

2022→2024

Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care injury rate improved

Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care's TCR fell 20.2 from 28.8 in 2022 to 8.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 166.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=28.8 · 2023=166.9 · 2024=8.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621610 · Bowling Green, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.7 · 360% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #43/43
  • PHOTO SKI
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SKI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care averages 18.7 TCR (360% of the Home care of elderly, medical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care TCR series: 2022=28.8 · 2023=166.9 · 2024=8.6 · BLS 5.2

Where Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care falls in its industry

3,635 Home care of elderly, medical establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 43 Home care of elderly, medical employers in Kentucky.

Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care (32 employees, TCR 18.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care
Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care (32 employees, TCR 18.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Med Center at Bowling Green Home Care has fewer employees than the Home care of elderly, medical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.6 5.7 3 0 0
2023 166.9 83.5 2 2 0
2022 28.8 25.2 1 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621610 · KY · Bowling Green

3,635 Home care of elderly, medical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 331 employers in Bowling Green, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SKI 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverside Private Duty-Peninsula 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crestview Center 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FRHC - Spokane/INW 18.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Limestone Transmission Substation 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schaefer General Contracting Services 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ray Black & Son, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE OMNI Commercial LLC 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Kentucky University-Bowling Green 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Medical Center at Bowling Green 1,872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Bowling Green Metalforming 1,441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bowling Green Metalforming 1,344 FTE
NAT-TCR Shell Lake Health Care Center 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dirigo Pines 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MacArthur District Maint. 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwest Confections, LLC 18.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Truck Specialists, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valls Group 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kobra Molds LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cimco Inc 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.