Homes for the aged with nursing care · Virginia

Medical Facilities of America Corporate

Roanoke, VA · ~196 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Medical Facilities of America Corporate runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Homes for the aged with nursing care workplace, earning a grade A.

Medical Facilities of America Corporate: 1.3 TCR = 19% of Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Medical Facilities of America Corporate safety composite

Medical Facilities of America Corporate scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Medical Facilities of America Corporate: 0.6 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.49× in 2020

Medical Facilities of America Corporate's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.6 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Roanoke, VA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #13/343
  • PHOTO Alexandria Operator …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~196 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alexandria Operator LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Medical Facilities of America Corporate in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Medical Facilities of America Corporate averages 1.3 TCR (19% of the Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Medical Facilities of America Corporate TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=2.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Medical Facilities of America Corporate falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursin establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 343 Homes for the aged with nursin employers in Virginia.

Medical Facilities of America Corporate (196 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Medical Facilities of America Corporate
Medical Facilities of America Corporate (196 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Medical Facilities of America Corporate has more employees than the Homes for the aged with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.5 0.6 4 0 0
2019 1.2 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · VA · Roanoke

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 415 employers in Roanoke, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alexandria Operator LLC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakwood Health Services 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stanford Healthcare and Rehab 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ILIFF NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Central Bakery 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAPEWELL AERIAL SYSTEMS LLC 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0420 LOWE S OF NEWPORT NEWS VA. 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE 029-00505 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carilion Clinic Co. 01 7,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roanoke City Public Schools 1,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Other Location 1,808 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carilion Clinic Services Co. 13 1,753 FTE
NAT-TCR Brewerton NY 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR RCS Construction 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Viceroy : APCom 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Buckley 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Upstate NY Transplant Services INC 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE UMS Brookfield 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holloway Houston Inc 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. DE 196 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.