Skilled nursing facilities · Michigan

Medilodge of Rochester Hills

Rochester Hills, MI · ~85 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Medilodge of Rochester Hills runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Medilodge of Rochester Hills: 7.7 TCR = 119% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Medilodge of Rochester Hills safety composite

Medilodge of Rochester Hills scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Medilodge of Rochester Hills held a steady TCR band

Medilodge of Rochester Hills's TCR held near 0.0 from 8.0 in 2016 to 8.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 22.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.0 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=22.6 · 2021=8.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Rochester Hills, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 7.7 · 119% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #241/471
  • PHOTO Buffalo Lake Healthc…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Buffalo Lake Healthcare Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Medilodge of Rochester Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Medilodge of Rochester Hills averages 7.7 TCR (119% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Medilodge of Rochester Hills TCR series: 2016=8 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=22.6 · 2021=8.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=8 · BLS 6.5

Where Medilodge of Rochester Hills falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #241 safest of 471 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Michigan.

Medilodge of Rochester Hills (85 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Medilodge of Rochester Hills
Medilodge of Rochester Hills (85 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Medilodge of Rochester Hills has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 0.0 2 0 0
2023 7.7 5.1 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.9 3.0 3 0 0
2020 22.6 20.9 2 11 0
2019 4.3 0.0 3 0 0
2018 7.7 0.0 6 0 0
2017 2.3 1.2 2 0 0
2016 8.0 8.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Rochester Hills

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 107 employers in Rochester Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Buffalo Lake Healthcare Center 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Iberia Manor South 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NSH Green Bay LLC 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beacon Brook Health Care Center 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Owen Ames Kimball Co. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Giannetti Contracting Corporation 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE JJ Barney Construction Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circuit Electric Michigan 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR FANUC America Corporation - Rochester Hills 1,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford- Rochester Hills Data Center 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester Hills Data Center 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR InfuSystem, Inc. - Headquarters 367 FTE
NAT-TCR Dura-Bar Metal Services Woodstock 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Builder's Supply Co. Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint Louis University Hospital 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CSA Constructors 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE MH St. Louis 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc. 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foti Contracting LLC 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE World Class Plastics, Inc. 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.