commercial printing · Pennsylvania

Menasha Packaging Company - Board

York, PA · ~73 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Menasha Packaging Company - Board runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical commercial printing workplace, earning a grade B.

Menasha Packaging Company - Board: 1.9 TCR = 56% of commercial printing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Menasha Packaging Company - Board safety composite

Menasha Packaging Company - Board scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2023

Menasha Packaging Company - Board injury rate improved

Menasha Packaging Company - Board's TCR fell 3.7 from 3.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · York, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/110
  • PHOTO Corporate Graphics N…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corporate Graphics North - 0028 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Menasha Packaging Company - Board in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Menasha Packaging Company - Board averages 1.9 TCR (56% of the commercial printing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Menasha Packaging Company - Board TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=2 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Menasha Packaging Company - Board falls in its industry

2,001 commercial printing establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 110 commercial printing employers in Pennsylvania.

Menasha Packaging Company - Board (73 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Menasha Packaging Company - Board
Menasha Packaging Company - Board (73 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Menasha Packaging Company - Board has fewer employees than the commercial printing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 4.8 1.6 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2018 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.7 3.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · PA · York

2,001 commercial printing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 496 employers in York, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corporate Graphics North - 0028 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR That's Great News 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garlock Flexibles 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orora Visual LLC 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE McMurray Operations 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Philly Schuylkill 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wohlsen Construction Self Perform 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan York Hospital 4,886 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan Medical Group 4,293 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wellspan Health 2,591 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx Supply Chain (Target York) 1,875 FTE
NAT-TCR Seattle 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lighting Etc Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Embassy Suites Atlanta Perimeter Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MSI Express - Geneva 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Optimum Performance Institute 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryan Iron Works, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE GGP Hatchery/Egg Depot (Elkmont) 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMS 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.