packaging and labeling services · Ohio

Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus

Groveport, OH · ~132 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical packaging and labeling services workplace, earning a grade A.

Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus: 0.9 TCR = 37% of packaging and labeling services BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus safety composite

Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus: 0.0 → 1.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561910 · Groveport, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/17
  • PHOTO IFS - PA, Hazleton C…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IFS - PA, Hazleton Custom (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus averages 0.9 TCR (37% of the packaging and labeling services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1 · 2022=1 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1 · BLS 2.6

Where Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus falls in its industry

228 packaging and labeling service establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 17 packaging and labeling service employers in Ohio.

Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus (132 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus
Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus (132 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus has more employees than the packaging and labeling services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.5 1.1 3 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561910 · OH · Groveport

228 packaging and labeling services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 135 employers in Groveport, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IFS - PA, Hazleton Custom 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hearthside Food Solutions 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLINICAL SUPPLIES MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, INC. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PreCon Plant 1 & 1A 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lencyk Masonry Co., Inc. 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kaiser Pickles Cincinnati 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE UFP Blanchester llc 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Archbold Container Corp 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ohio Fulfillment Center (OFC) 1,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 9475 992 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus 859 FTE
CITY-NEAR RICART AUTOMOTIVE PERSONNEL INC 737 FTE
NAT-TCR WSC - Fort Sill Grounds Maintenance 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Goyette Mechanical 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri Dal, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR A&A Cable Contractor's Inc/Cruz Tec, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crews Chevrolet 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE UMSanDiego951 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solano Diversified Services 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE HVAC, Inc. 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.