corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe

Latrobe, PA · ~41 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe: 3.5 TCR = 105% of corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe safety composite

Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe: 0.0 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2024

Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe's TCR rose 3.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Latrobe, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 105% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #44/81
  • PHOTO AGE Houston Plant
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AGE Houston Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe averages 3.5 TCR (105% of the corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=5.6 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe falls in its industry

1,338 corrugated and solid fiber box establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 81 corrugated and solid fiber box employers in Pennsylvania.

Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe (41 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe
Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe (41 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Menasha Packaging Company - Latrobe has fewer employees than the corrugated and solid fiber box manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2023 5.6 2.8 1 1 0
2022 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2021 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 6.1 0.0 0 2 0
2019 8.4 0.0 2 1 0
2018 2.6 0.0 0 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · PA · Latrobe

1,338 corrugated and solid fiber box manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 66 employers in Latrobe, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AGE Houston Plant 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Akers Packaging Service Group - Tecumseh Division 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Total Source Packaging 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shoreline Holland 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE SpecialtyEgg 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA Operations 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.B. Mill & Fabricating Inc. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller Environmental, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Latrobe Hospital 848 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : LSM - Latrobe 654 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adelphoi Village, Inc. 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Latrobe Tech Center 534 FTE
NAT-TCR H & R Agripower - Columbus 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AdventHealth Lake Placid 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 074 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 61 Morgan Services Dayton 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Watford City Fabrication Shop 1-2 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE CP&P Harrisonburg Precast 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berkots 307 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newbern 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.