packaging and labeling services · Wisconsin

Menasha Packaging Company - MFC

Neenah, WI · ~195 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Menasha Packaging Company - MFC runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical packaging and labeling services workplace, earning a grade A.

Menasha Packaging Company - MFC: 0.4 TCR = 14% of packaging and labeling services BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Menasha Packaging Company - MFC safety composite

Menasha Packaging Company - MFC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Menasha Packaging Company - MFC held a steady TCR band

Menasha Packaging Company - MFC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.4 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.4 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561910 · Neenah, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #1/16
  • PHOTO Menasha Packaging Co…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~195 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Menasha Packaging Company - Aurora (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Menasha Packaging Company - MFC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Menasha Packaging Company - MFC averages 0.4 TCR (14% of the packaging and labeling services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Menasha Packaging Company - MFC TCR series: 2016=0.4 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 2.6

Where Menasha Packaging Company - MFC falls in its industry

228 packaging and labeling service establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 16 packaging and labeling service employers in Wisconsin.

Menasha Packaging Company - MFC (195 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Menasha Packaging Company - MFC
Menasha Packaging Company - MFC (195 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Menasha Packaging Company - MFC has more employees than the packaging and labeling services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2023 0.4 0.0 0 1 0
2022 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.8 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561910 · WI · Neenah

228 packaging and labeling services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 182 employers in Neenah, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Aurora 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Winchester 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Newville 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Edwardsville 9G 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Service Center 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Five Star Energy Services, LLC 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enerpac Columbus Operations 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saris 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR Neenah IOEC Corporate Offices 1,745 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miron Construction Co., Inc. 1,490 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center - Neenah 1,445 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Neenah 1,399 FTE
NAT-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Aurora 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Qorvo - 7907 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR EnviroCon Systems, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sentry Household Shipping, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kilbourn 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giroux's Poultry Farm, Inc. 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE King Hickory Furniture Company 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Children's Hospital Colorado - Briargate 195 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.