packaging and labeling services · California

Menasha Packaging Company - Railto

Bloomington, CA · ~66 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Menasha Packaging Company - Railto runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical packaging and labeling services workplace, earning a grade A.

Menasha Packaging Company - Railto: 0.3 TCR = 10% of packaging and labeling services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Menasha Packaging Company - Railto safety composite

Menasha Packaging Company - Railto scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Menasha Packaging Company - Railto: 0.0 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 1.3 TCR · DART/TCR 5.08× in 2021

Menasha Packaging Company - Railto's TCR rose 1.3 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.3 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 5.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561910 · Bloomington, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #1/14
  • PHOTO Bolingbrook, IL - A412
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bolingbrook, IL - A412 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Menasha Packaging Company - Railto in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Menasha Packaging Company - Railto averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the packaging and labeling services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Menasha Packaging Company - Railto TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.3 · BLS 2.6

Where Menasha Packaging Company - Railto falls in its industry

228 packaging and labeling service establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 14 packaging and labeling service employers in California.

Menasha Packaging Company - Railto (66 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Menasha Packaging Company - Railto
Menasha Packaging Company - Railto (66 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Menasha Packaging Company - Railto has fewer employees than the packaging and labeling services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561910 · CA · Bloomington

228 packaging and labeling services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 71 employers in Bloomington, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bolingbrook, IL - A412 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Synergetics, Inc. (Central) 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hood Container Louisville PS 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Lakeville Kitting 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nuseed Americas, Inc., West Sacramento Innovation Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORGANIC BUNCH HARVESTING 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Navco Berry Harvest 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE kings orchards, llc 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-RLTO 2,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SBD1 2,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 551 1,679 FTE
CITY-NEAR 923 1,150 FTE
NAT-TCR Kionix Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 4450 10th Ave SE 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR EthosEnergy Field Services Texas Office 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix Construction 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Viessmann Manufacturing Company (US) 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Horn Senior Living 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lile Relocation - Tualatin HHG Branch 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE CSS Farms - Agri Pack 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.