Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Indiana

Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St.

Richmond, IN · ~143 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St. runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St.: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St. safety composite

Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St. held a steady TCR band

Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 1.4 in 2022 to 1.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Richmond, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #18/67
  • PHOTO Menasha Packaging Co…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Menasha Packaging Company - Neenah (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St. averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St. TCR series: 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St. falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 67 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Indiana.

Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St. (143 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St.
Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St. (143 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Menasha Packaging Company-Richmond G St. has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · IN · Richmond

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 131 employers in Richmond, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Neenah 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Rockwall Corrugating) LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norwalk / Los Angeles - D017 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR IP Madison 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Deig Bros. Lumber & Construction Co., Inc. 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clabber Girl Corporation - Main 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE FXI, Inc. - Fort Wayne 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROTATIONAL MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR City Of Richmond 535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Belden, Inc. 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1745 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1745 361 FTE
NAT-TCR Florida 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kent Co. Airport Hanger 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pomps Tire - Dupo Retread 515 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Party Reflections COL 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ohio Warehouse 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medicalodges Coffeyville on Midland 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westover, Wv - 3380 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winona Mn - 3172 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.