Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Massachusetts

Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill

Ludlow, MA · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade C.

Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill safety composite

Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill held a steady TCR band

Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Ludlow, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/74
  • PHOTO Wallkill IRA
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wallkill IRA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 74 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Massachusetts.

Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill
Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Mental Health Association, Inc. Nash Hill has fewer employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MA · Ludlow

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 23 employers in Ludlow, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wallkill IRA 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Services For Young Adults 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Young Adult Services 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR East 170th Residence 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE SANDY POND-MA44 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE NORTH ANDOVER-HAVERHILL-MA29 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE 956-NiSource-Wrentham MA 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Integrated Builders, Inc. 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Western MA 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kleeberg SheetMetal 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kleeberg Sheet Metal 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Big Y Foods, Inc. Ludlow 153 FTE
NAT-TCR Portsmouth NNSY Commissary 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Health and Rehab 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Capitol Land & Livestock Trucks, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 206 / 503 Waukesha Pearce Industries Corpus Christi 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frontera Cattle Company II, LLC 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX_Houston_4545 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.