Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding · New Jersey

Mercer County Surgery Center

Lawrenceville, NJ · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mercer County Surgery Center runs at 412% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding workplace, earning a grade F.

Mercer County Surgery Center: 15.7 TCR = 412% of Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mercer County Surgery Center safety composite

Mercer County Surgery Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.1

2017→2020

Mercer County Surgery Center injury rate improved

Mercer County Surgery Center's TCR fell 16.1 from 28.2 in 2017 to 12.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 28.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=28.2 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=17.1 · 2020=12.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621493 · Lawrenceville, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.7 · 412% of ind

  • DART 12.1 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Edina Specialty Surg…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edina Specialty Surgery Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Mercer County Surgery Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mercer County Surgery Center averages 15.7 TCR (412% of the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mercer County Surgery Center TCR series: 2017=28.2 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=17.1 · 2020=12.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Mercer County Surgery Center falls in its industry

498 Ambulatory surgical centers an establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Ambulatory surgical centers an employers in New Jersey.

Mercer County Surgery Center (29 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mercer County Surgery Center
Mercer County Surgery Center (29 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2

Mercer County Surgery Center has fewer employees than the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 12.1 12.1 2 0 0
2019 17.1 4.3 1 3 0
2018 5.3 0.0 0 1 0
2017 28.2 11.3 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621493 · NJ · Lawrenceville

498 Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 57 employers in Lawrenceville, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edina Specialty Surgery Center 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palos Hills Surgery Center 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAPTIST HEALTH SURGERY CENTER LLC 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Surgical Care Affiliates 15.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRP Services Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied Construction Group Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Renda Roads, Inc. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMAC Communications Inc 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAWRENCEVILLE 1,069 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Lawrenceville School 525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence Operator LLC 462 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Lawrence Rehabilitation Center 425 FTE
NAT-TCR New Hampshire Plastics, LLC 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 140 - Anaheim 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bickford of Quincy 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 4765-MOBCIUSPS 15.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Beginning, Inc 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Gardens Citrus Nursery, LLC 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Black Gold Farms - NCC 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riddell Ontario 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.