General medical and surgical hospitals · Missouri

Mercy Hospital Washington

Washington, MO · ~1,100 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mercy Hospital Washington runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade B.

Mercy Hospital Washington: 4.0 TCR = 54% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mercy Hospital Washington safety composite

Mercy Hospital Washington scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mercy Hospital Washington: 3.6 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.29× in 2024

Mercy Hospital Washington's TCR rose 0.6 from 3.6 in 2018 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Washington, MO AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 4.0 · 54% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #35/115
  • PHOTO Meriter Middleton
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 204 inj
  • SIZE ~1,100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meriter Middleton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Mercy Hospital Washington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mercy Hospital Washington averages 4.0 TCR (54% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mercy Hospital Washington TCR series: 2018=3.6 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 7.5

Where Mercy Hospital Washington falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 115 General medical and surgical h employers in Missouri.

Mercy Hospital Washington (1,100 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mercy Hospital Washington
Mercy Hospital Washington (1,100 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Mercy Hospital Washington has more employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 1.2 36 0 0
2023 3.8 0.8 27 3 0
2022 4.1 0.7 32 0 0
2021 3.4 0.8 26 0 0
2020 3.5 0.4 26 1 0
2019 5.6 0.1 26 24 0
2018 3.6 1.1 31 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MO · Washington

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 62 employers in Washington, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meriter Middleton 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FLJAC176 ASV ST. JOHNS COUNTY 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GSS-SHELBYVILLE-2 HSHS GOOD SHEPHERD HOSPITAL 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stewart Memorial Community Hospital 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE EFCO Monett Mo 1,100 FTE
STATE-SIZE River City Casino and Hotel 1,100 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCI1 1,102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Worlds of Fun 1,098 FTE
CITY-NEAR Instrumentation : Washington SPO215 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fluid Connectors : Washington SPO215 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR 172 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 172 357 FTE
NAT-TCR Hillcrest Health & Rehab 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR EB-LCOA-Le Creuset of America/EB 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Printing Port 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hankins Lumber Co, Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE FHN - Memorial Hospital 1,100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - KBWI 1,100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Falls Memorial Medical Center 1,100 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Luke's Hospital Allentown 1,100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.