Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di · Alabama

Mercy Life of AL

Mobile, AL · ~73 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mercy Life of AL runs at 199% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di workplace, earning a grade D.

Mercy Life of AL: 7.6 TCR = 199% of Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mercy Life of AL safety composite

Mercy Life of AL scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mercy Life of AL held a steady TCR band

Mercy Life of AL's TCR held near 0.2 from 8.5 in 2016 to 8.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.5 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=8.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Mobile, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.6 · 199% of ind

  • DART 8.7 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO PACE Reasner
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PACE Reasner (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Mercy Life of AL in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mercy Life of AL averages 7.6 TCR (199% of the Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mercy Life of AL TCR series: 2016=8.5 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=5 · 2021=8.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Mercy Life of AL falls in its industry

1,320 Day care centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Day care centers for disabled employers in Alabama.

Mercy Life of AL (73 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mercy Life of AL
Mercy Life of AL (73 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Mercy Life of AL has more employees than the Day care centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.7 8.7 4 1 0
2020 5.0 5.0 2 1 0
2019 6.2 6.2 4 0 0
2018 7.7 3.1 5 0 0
2017 9.3 3.1 6 0 0
2016 8.5 7.1 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · AL · Mobile

1,320 Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 505 employers in Mobile, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PACE Reasner 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salinas Programs 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barber National Institute - East Erie Worth 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR OUI 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE GGP Hatchery/Egg Depot (Elkmont) 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trussville Crew Headquarters 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trussville Crew Headquarters - APC 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE KBB Electrical Contractors LLC 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Austal USA LLC 3,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE INFIRMARY 2,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hargrove Engineers and Constructors 1,949 FTE
NAT-TCR Baltimore 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnson Bros. - West Salem, Inc. 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Chattanooga Tent Company 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 214 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Doubletree Whittier Los Angeles 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Architectural Systems Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency Care of Rogue Valley 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction Administration 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.