Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) · North Carolina

Mercy Restorative Care

Charlotte, NC · ~45 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mercy Restorative Care runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) workplace, earning a grade C.

Mercy Restorative Care: 3.8 TCR = 101% of Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mercy Restorative Care safety composite

Mercy Restorative Care scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mercy Restorative Care: 3.0 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

Mercy Restorative Care's TCR rose 2.3 from 3.0 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 101% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/22
  • PHOTO 0000000005 JOHN HEIN…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 0000000005 JOHN HEINZ INSTITUTE OF REHAB (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Mercy Restorative Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mercy Restorative Care averages 3.8 TCR (101% of the Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mercy Restorative Care TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=5.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Mercy Restorative Care falls in its industry

1,390 Hospitals, specialty (except p establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 22 Hospitals, specialty (except p employers in North Carolina.

Mercy Restorative Care (45 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mercy Restorative Care
Mercy Restorative Care (45 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Mercy Restorative Care has fewer employees than the Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2016 3.0 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · NC · Charlotte

1,390 Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 0000000005 JOHN HEINZ INSTITUTE OF REHAB 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR H4509 KINDRED HOSPITAL - EAST NEW JERSEY 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Laurel Highlands, Inc 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Happy Holiday Christmas Trees 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cracon, Inc. 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE GOMEZ HARVESTING 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewisville Operations Center 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant Carlisle 6442 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Orion Engineered Systems 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Marshall Dekalb Electric Copperative 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrisburg (Pambg) 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Bridge Company 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maples Farm & Garden Center 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clean Venture Inc. - Clayton 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc. - Morristown 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.