Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill

San Diego, CA · ~47 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill runs at 199% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill: 7.6 TCR = 199% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill safety composite

Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2018→2024

Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill injury rate improved

Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill's TCR fell 1.8 from 11.0 in 2018 to 9.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.0 · 2019=5.0 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=9.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.6 · 199% of ind

  • DART 9.1 DART
  • RANK #219/635
  • PHOTO The Palms at Sun City
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Palms at Sun City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill averages 7.6 TCR (199% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill TCR series: 2018=11 · 2019=5 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=9.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #219 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill (47 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill
Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill (47 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.1 9.1 3 0 0
2023 10.3 10.3 4 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2021 7.5 7.5 3 0 0
2019 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2018 11.0 11.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · San Diego

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Palms at Sun City 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Edina 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Birch Creek 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 62024 BRIGHTON GARDENS OF WHEATON 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company,Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ruiz Farm Labor 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Valley Harvesting, LLC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 424 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 5035 Wilkes Barre General Hospital 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wayne's Roofing, Inc. 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Elco, Inc DBA Metalsdepot 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foster Manufacturing LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pergan Marshall LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Man-Inc-Mansfield Juvenile Treat 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whitco Roofing Inc 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.