Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park

Eugene, OR · ~104 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park runs at 395% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park: 15.0 TCR = 395% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park safety composite

Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2023→2024

Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park injury rate improved

Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park's TCR fell 11.6 from 20.8 in 2023 to 9.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 20.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=20.8 · 2024=9.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Eugene, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.0 · 395% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #167/218
  • PHOTO Estancia Del Sol
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Estancia Del Sol (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park averages 15.0 TCR (395% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park TCR series: 2023=20.8 · 2024=9.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #167 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park (104 employees, TCR 15.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park
Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park (104 employees, TCR 15.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Merrill Gardens at Sheldon Park has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.2 1.3 7 0 0
2023 20.8 15.6 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Eugene

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 466 employers in Eugene, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Estancia Del Sol 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ecumen Sand Prairie 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10084 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garden Plaza of Post Falls 15.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hayden Homes LLC - OR 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adroit Construction Co., Inc 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Support Services -Roseburg 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maintenance and Operations - Bend Bldg B & G 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR MATT KNIGHT ARENA 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hult Center for the Performing Arts 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHMG PHOR Clinics 848 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHMC at University District 564 FTE
NAT-TCR Sumter Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Fishermen Shipyard and Electric, LLC 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fellowship Manor 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Regis New York 15.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE TMD Machining, INC. 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bulldog Logistics, LLC 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insteel Wire Products FLW 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE 113 City Plaza 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.