Bus bars, electrical conductors (except switchgear-type), manufacturing · New York

Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp

Rochester, NY · ~118 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bus bars, electrical conductors (except switchgear-type), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp: 2.4 TCR = 74% of Bus bars, electrical conductors (except switchgear-type), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp safety composite

Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp held a steady TCR band

Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.8 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335931 · Rochester, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Hackettstown - 1 Esn…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hackettstown - 1 Esna Park on Newburg Rd. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp averages 2.4 TCR (74% of the Bus bars, electrical conductors (except switchgear-type), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=2 · 2019=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp falls in its industry

152 Bus bars, electrical conductor establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Bus bars, electrical conductor employers in New York.

Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp (118 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp
Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp (118 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Mersen USA Rochester-NY Corp has more employees than the Bus bars, electrical conductors (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.7 0.0 2 0 0
2018 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2017 4.2 2.1 2 2 0
2016 1.8 0.9 2 0 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335931 · NY · Rochester

152 Bus bars, electrical conductors (except switchgear-type), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hackettstown - 1 Esna Park on Newburg Rd. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sumitomo SV5-2 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Globaltec 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mencom Corporation 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crist Bros. Orchards, Inc. 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lamb FArms Inc 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Binghamton ECC 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Nyack, NY 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Hatley House 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilltop Manor Health and Rehabiliation Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Warehouse 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Mount Crossing 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE University Hills Healthcare Center 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkridge Nursing Center 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Showplace Landscape Services 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE C.E. Toland & Son 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.