Van lines, moving and storage services · Idaho

Mesa Moving and Storage Boise

Boise, ID · ~24 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mesa Moving and Storage Boise runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Van lines, moving and storage services workplace, earning a grade F.

Mesa Moving and Storage Boise: 11.5 TCR = 256% of Van lines, moving and storage services BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mesa Moving and Storage Boise safety composite

Mesa Moving and Storage Boise scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2016→2023

Mesa Moving and Storage Boise injury rate improved

Mesa Moving and Storage Boise's TCR fell 7.2 from 18.6 in 2016 to 11.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 55.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.6 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=17.8 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=14.2 · 2022=55.8 · 2023=11.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484210 · Boise, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 256% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Hanover Transfer and…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hanover Transfer and Storage (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Mesa Moving and Storage Boise in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mesa Moving and Storage Boise averages 11.5 TCR (256% of the Van lines, moving and storage services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mesa Moving and Storage Boise TCR series: 2016=18.6 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=17.8 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=14.2 · 2022=55.8 · 2023=11.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Mesa Moving and Storage Boise falls in its industry

548 Van lines, moving and storage establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Van lines, moving and storage employers in Idaho.

Mesa Moving and Storage Boise (24 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 7.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mesa Moving and Storage Boise
Mesa Moving and Storage Boise (24 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 7.6

Mesa Moving and Storage Boise has fewer employees than the Van lines, moving and storage services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 11.4 0.0 2 0 0
2022 55.8 55.8 3 0 0
2020 14.2 10.6 4 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2018 17.8 7.1 5 0 0
2017 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2016 18.6 18.6 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484210 · ID · Boise

548 Van lines, moving and storage services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 581 employers in Boise, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hanover Transfer and Storage 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR New World Van Lines of Texas 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Englewood - Logistics 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lile International Companies Branch 204 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Montana-Dakota Utilities Group - Boise IT 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE SPC of east Idaho 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ormond Builders, Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crea Construction, Inc. 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Boise Medical Center (Including MSTI) 10,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1-Boise Main Site 6,035 FTE
CITY-NEAR Micron Boise Site 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center 3,869 FTE
NAT-TCR Compassus - Reston 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Crystal Creek Assisted Living & Memory Care 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverside, Ca #00026 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodman Veneer & Lumber Company 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mesa Moving and Storage Bozeman, LLC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE SGS Retail - Point Comfort 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE AWI Auto Value Performance Jackson Main 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE A1 Truck Bay City 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.