HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors · California

Mesa - San Francisco

San Leandro, CA · ~168 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mesa - San Francisco runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Mesa - San Francisco: 0.6 TCR = 23% of HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mesa - San Francisco safety composite

Mesa - San Francisco scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mesa - San Francisco held a steady TCR band

Mesa - San Francisco's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.7 in 2019 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · San Leandro, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/594
  • PHOTO Bayside Fire Protect…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bayside Fire Protection (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mesa - San Francisco in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mesa - San Francisco averages 0.6 TCR (23% of the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mesa - San Francisco TCR series: 2019=0.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Mesa - San Francisco falls in its industry

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 594 HVAC (heating, ventilation and employers in California.

Mesa - San Francisco (168 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mesa - San Francisco
Mesa - San Francisco (168 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Mesa - San Francisco has more employees than the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-condi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · San Leandro

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 227 employers in San Leandro, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bayside Fire Protection 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR tessiers inc 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Union, NJ HVAC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt Storm Power Station 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mininger Farms 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bud of California Lettuce 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Sun Grower Services/Equipment Services & Lucero Farms - Los Banos 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCH 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 475 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 571 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120451 2,079 FTE
CITY-NEAR 02820451 SAN LEANDRO MEDICAL CENTER 1,763 FTE
NAT-TCR CE North America LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NFCU 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston- Export 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Appleton WI 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crossroads 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Uf Health Jacksonvil 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duluth Transit Authority 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wichita KS FXFE-WTK 168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.