Coating metals and metal products for the trade · Mississippi

Metal Coaters of Mississippi

Jackson, MS · ~102 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metal Coaters of Mississippi runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Metal Coaters of Mississippi: 2.7 TCR = 82% of Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metal Coaters of Mississippi safety composite

Metal Coaters of Mississippi scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Metal Coaters of Mississippi: 0.8 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2021

Metal Coaters of Mississippi's TCR rose 2.3 from 0.8 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Jackson, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO Shelby - CR
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shelby - CR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Metal Coaters of Mississippi in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metal Coaters of Mississippi averages 2.7 TCR (82% of the Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metal Coaters of Mississippi TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=2.4 · 2021=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Metal Coaters of Mississippi falls in its industry

646 Coating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Coating metals and metal produ employers in Mississippi.

Metal Coaters of Mississippi (102 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Metal Coaters of Mississippi
Metal Coaters of Mississippi (102 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Metal Coaters of Mississippi has more employees than the Coating metals and metal products for th median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.1 2.3 4 0 0
2018 2.4 0.0 3 0 0
2017 4.5 2.3 6 0 0
2016 0.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · MS · Jackson

646 Coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 260 employers in Jackson, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shelby - CR 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wheeling-Nippon Steel 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Coatings Corporation 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR E/M Coating Services 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Central Electric Power Assocation 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookhaven, MS 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Contract Fabricators, Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nidec Motor Corporation 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Dominic Jackson Memorial Hospital 2,937 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mississippi Baptist Medical Center 2,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Memorial Hospital - Mississippi Baptist Medical Center 2,566 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSJAC - JACKSON 1,458 FTE
NAT-TCR S.S. Hert Lucerne Valley 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Martin's Country Market, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR BlueScope Buildings North America Jackson TN 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Coke Capital Kresson St. 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Public Works - Maintenance Facility 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard Boston Downtown Marriott 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dot Foods, Inc.- ID 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE HealthCare High Point 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.