Gold bullion or dore bar produced at primary metal refineries · Massachusetts

Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining)

North Attleboro, MA · ~82 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining) runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Gold bullion or dore bar produced at primary metal refineries workplace, earning a grade C.

Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining): 3.4 TCR = 103% of Gold bullion or dore bar produced at primary metal refineries BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining) safety composite

Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining): 2.8 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2017

Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining)'s TCR rose 1.1 from 2.8 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331410 · North Attleboro, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 103% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO REC Silicon
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: REC Silicon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining) averages 3.4 TCR (103% of the Gold bullion or dore bar produced at primary metal refineries BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining) TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining) falls in its industry

57 Gold bullion or dore bar produ establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Gold bullion or dore bar produ employers in Massachusetts.

Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining) (82 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining)
Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining) (82 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Metalor Technologies USA, (Refining) has fewer employees than the Gold bullion or dore bar produced at pri median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 4.0 4.0 2 1 0
2016 2.8 2.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331410 · MA · North Attleboro

57 Gold bullion or dore bar produced at primary metal refineries employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 44 employers in North Attleboro, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR REC Silicon 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Globe Metallurgical, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hayden Operations 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR RECYCLING COORDINATORS INC 600 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE LEOMINSTER-MA16 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE 465 Sykes Road 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Braintree Laboratories 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gagliarducci Construction. Inc 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hockomock Area YMCA 597 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2366 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2366 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1190 - North Attleborough 219 FTE
NAT-TCR Dyersburg Nursing and Rehabilitation, Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Health - El Paso 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR USA San Antonio 9603 Saunders Rd 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Texhoma Truss LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Warrenton Inc 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alan Kunsman Roofing & Siding, Inc. 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sinatra and Company Real Estate 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northgate Bilo Foods and Pharmacy 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.