Fuel propellants, solid inorganic, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing · Indiana

Metals and Additives Plant

Brazil, IN · ~59 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metals and Additives Plant runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fuel propellants, solid inorganic, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Metals and Additives Plant: 5.7 TCR = 173% of Fuel propellants, solid inorganic, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metals and Additives Plant safety composite

Metals and Additives Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Metals and Additives Plant: 4.9 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.73× in 2023

Metals and Additives Plant's TCR rose 1.3 from 4.9 in 2021 to 6.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325180 · Brazil, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 173% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #16/19
  • PHOTO Hammond Expanders
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hammond Expanders (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Metals and Additives Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metals and Additives Plant averages 5.7 TCR (173% of the Fuel propellants, solid inorganic, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metals and Additives Plant TCR series: 2021=4.9 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=6.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Metals and Additives Plant falls in its industry

418 Fuel propellants, solid inorga establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 19 Fuel propellants, solid inorga employers in Indiana.

Metals and Additives Plant (59 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Metals and Additives Plant
Metals and Additives Plant (59 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Metals and Additives Plant has fewer employees than the Fuel propellants, solid inorganic, not s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.2 4.2 2 1 0
2022 5.9 4.4 4 0 0
2021 4.9 4.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325180 · IN · Brazil

418 Fuel propellants, solid inorganic, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 25 employers in Brazil, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hammond Expanders 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern States Chemicals SeaGate 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evonik Active Oxygens, LLC - Tonawanda 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rowell Chemical Corporation 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bio Town Ag, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spy Run Building 3 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Annex Group 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE JGBowers, Inc. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Dane; Brazil, IN 1,268 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Dane - Brazil 1,142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Dane Brazil 1,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Dane 983 FTE
NAT-TCR Lakewood Senior Living,Drums ,LLC d/b/a/ Fritzingertown Senior Living Commuity 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lone Star Medical Transportation 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Follett Dairy Farm 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR FIC Bloomingdale 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Building 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Real Alloy Recycling, LLC - Friendly, WV 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Material Transfer Company 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkers Prairie Elementary 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.