Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Methuen Village

Methuen, MA · ~77 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Methuen Village runs at 386% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Methuen Village: 14.7 TCR = 386% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Methuen Village safety composite

Methuen Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2024

Methuen Village injury rate improved

Methuen Village's TCR fell 3.9 from 12.9 in 2016 to 9.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 78.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.9 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=11.1 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=17.9 · 2021=12.1 · 2022=78.5 · 2023=42.4 · 2024=9.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Methuen, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.7 · 386% of ind

  • DART 9.0 DART
  • RANK #178/210
  • PHOTO Liberty Frontida, In…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Liberty Frontida, Inc. - Liberty House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Methuen Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Methuen Village averages 14.7 TCR (386% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Methuen Village TCR series: 2016=12.9 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=11.1 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=17.9 · 2021=12.1 · 2022=78.5 · 2023=42.4 · 2024=9 · BLS 3.8

Where Methuen Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #178 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Methuen Village (77 employees, TCR 14.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Methuen Village
Methuen Village (77 employees, TCR 14.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Methuen Village has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.0 9.0 5 0 0
2023 42.4 42.4 3 19 0
2022 78.5 75.8 2 28 0
2021 12.1 12.1 5 1 0
2020 17.9 17.9 1 9 0
2019 8.4 8.4 4 0 0
2018 11.1 5.5 6 0 0
2017 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2016 12.9 9.2 4 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Methuen

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 53 employers in Methuen, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Liberty Frontida, Inc. - Liberty House 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Sheridan at Chesterfield 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garden Place 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Perspective - West Bend 14.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Richmond Group Main Office 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chapman Construction/Design 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE G.V.W., Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5001 - Avon, MA 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Family Hospital - Methuen 1,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shaw's Methuen Distribution Center 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Ann's Home, Inc 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0033-0033-06652 FAC-06652-METHUEN-MA 306 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0009 Modesto 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0139 Everett 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1281 PYP Monrovia 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Little sisters of the Poor, St. Joseph's Home for the Elderly 14.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midwest Industrial Fuels 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waters of Greencastle 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transportation 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE EASTVIEW 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.