Home health agencies · Minnesota

Metropolitan Center for Ind Living

St Paul, MN · ~179 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
5.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metropolitan Center for Ind Living runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Home health agencies workplace, earning a grade A.

Metropolitan Center for Ind Living: 1.4 TCR = 27% of Home health agencies BLS 5.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metropolitan Center for Ind Living safety composite

Metropolitan Center for Ind Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2022

Metropolitan Center for Ind Living injury rate improved

Metropolitan Center for Ind Living's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621610 · St Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/129
  • PHOTO HealthStar - Cloquet…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~179 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HealthStar - Cloquet/Fairmont (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Metropolitan Center for Ind Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metropolitan Center for Ind Living averages 1.4 TCR (27% of the Home health agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metropolitan Center for Ind Living TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0 · BLS 5.2

Where Metropolitan Center for Ind Living falls in its industry

3,635 Home health agencies establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 129 Home health agencies employers in Minnesota.

Metropolitan Center for Ind Living (179 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Metropolitan Center for Ind Living
Metropolitan Center for Ind Living (179 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Metropolitan Center for Ind Living has more employees than the Home health agencies median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.3 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.3 0.6 2 0 0
2018 1.3 0.7 2 0 0
2017 3.1 1.5 2 0 0
2016 3.0 1.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621610 · MN · St Paul

3,635 Home health agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 230 employers in St Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HealthStar - Cloquet/Fairmont 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockaway Home Care 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Companions and Homemakers Norwich 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Media - Pa 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schadegg Mechanical, Inc. 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mendota Heights MN - ACT 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3495-50CA207 179 FTE
STATE-SIZE FRIDLEY MN - 3018 179 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1010 REGIONS HOSPITAL 5,313 FTE
CITY-NEAR HPI-Ramsey 5,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travelers St Paul Office 2,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marsden Bldg Maintenance 1,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Landsberg San Jose 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Brazos-Valley Division, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 488307-Houston Insp Svc Division 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 993 - Weatherford 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crane Kennesaw 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vibra Rehabilitation Hospital of Florence, LLC d/b/a Gateway Rehabilitation Hospital 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paeto - Easton Hib 179 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bella Terra of Wheeling 179 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.