Farm supplies merchant wholesalers · Missouri

MFA Agri Service - Centralia

Centralia, MO · ~20 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MFA Agri Service - Centralia runs at 243% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Farm supplies merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

MFA Agri Service - Centralia: 5.3 TCR = 243% of Farm supplies merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MFA Agri Service - Centralia safety composite

MFA Agri Service - Centralia scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.3

2016→2024

MFA Agri Service - Centralia injury rate improved

MFA Agri Service - Centralia's TCR fell 9.3 from 9.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=8.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=10.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424910 · Centralia, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.3 · 243% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/50
  • PHOTO Edgerton, WI
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edgerton, WI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

MFA Agri Service - Centralia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MFA Agri Service - Centralia averages 5.3 TCR (243% of the Farm supplies merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MFA Agri Service - Centralia TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=8.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=5 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=10.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where MFA Agri Service - Centralia falls in its industry

1,202 Farm supplies merchant wholesa establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 50 Farm supplies merchant wholesa employers in Missouri.

MFA Agri Service - Centralia (20 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 30 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate MFA Agri Service - Centralia
MFA Agri Service - Centralia (20 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 30 employees and a TCR of 3.5

MFA Agri Service - Centralia has fewer employees than the Farm supplies merchant wholesalers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 10.4 5.2 2 0 0
2022 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2021 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.5 4.3 2 0 0
2018 9.7 4.9 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 9.3 9.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424910 · MO · Centralia

1,202 Farm supplies merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 4 employers in Centralia, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edgerton, WI 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winchester 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR StateLine N Burt Ag Location 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Home Office 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CoverCress INC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE RUCKMAN #9 - 16 & 27 -EST 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silver Creek Pig, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newport Farms, LLC. 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hubbell Power System - Centralia 827 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hubbell Power Systems - Centralia Operation 798 FTE
CITY-NEAR 281434-CENTRALIA MO PO 21 FTE
NAT-TCR J.A.M. Construction, Inc. of NC FL 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR DC Goodman 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Junction - BMD 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Batesville Casket Stamping Plant 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Johns Island SC Yard 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anthony Oliva, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mitchell Plumbing, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haz Pharmacy 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.