Pneumatic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing · Michigan

MFP Automation Engineering

Hudsonville, MI · ~69 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MFP Automation Engineering runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pneumatic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

MFP Automation Engineering: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Pneumatic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MFP Automation Engineering safety composite

MFP Automation Engineering scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

MFP Automation Engineering held a steady TCR band

MFP Automation Engineering's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.6 in 2018 to 1.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.6 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333995 · Hudsonville, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #3/12
  • PHOTO Cross Manufacturing …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cross Manufacturing Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

MFP Automation Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MFP Automation Engineering averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Pneumatic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MFP Automation Engineering TCR series: 2018=1.6 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where MFP Automation Engineering falls in its industry

137 Pneumatic cylinders, fluid pow establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 12 Pneumatic cylinders, fluid pow employers in Michigan.

MFP Automation Engineering (69 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate MFP Automation Engineering
MFP Automation Engineering (69 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.6

MFP Automation Engineering has fewer employees than the Pneumatic cylinders, fluid power, manufa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.7 0.0 2 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333995 · MI · Hudsonville

137 Pneumatic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 62 employers in Hudsonville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cross Manufacturing Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danfoss 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ace Controls, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR B&H Machine Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4605_10312 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (OH) 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works City of Wyoming 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE The LaSalle Group Inc 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR HIH INC 585 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quincy 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kent Quality Foods 386 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8373_19059 346 FTE
NAT-TCR Daavlin 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rincon Engineering Corp 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 44241j - Newnan Ga Ges Pec 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 49361l - Layton Bin 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vox Printing L.L.C. 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evonik Corporation, Wichita Kansas 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gold Star Insulation #870 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Pacific Harvesting | Citrus Harvesting 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.