Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · North Carolina

MGF Logistics LLC

Charlotte, NC · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
28.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MGF Logistics LLC runs at 624% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade F.

MGF Logistics LLC: 28.1 TCR = 624% of Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MGF Logistics LLC safety composite

MGF Logistics LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 28.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 36.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

MGF Logistics LLC: 19.5 → 36.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 54.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.31× in 2024

MGF Logistics LLC's TCR rose 17.1 from 19.5 in 2022 to 36.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 54.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 28.1 · 624% of ind

  • DART 36.6 DART
  • RANK #49/50
  • PHOTO 6458-ZBUR
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6458-ZBUR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

MGF Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MGF Logistics LLC averages 28.1 TCR (624% of the Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MGF Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=19.5 · 2023=54.9 · 2024=36.6 · BLS 4.5

Where MGF Logistics LLC falls in its industry

1,452 Delivery service (except as pa establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 50 Delivery service (except as pa employers in North Carolina.

MGF Logistics LLC (34 employees, TCR 28.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate MGF Logistics LLC
MGF Logistics LLC (34 employees, TCR 28.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

MGF Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Delivery service (except as part of inte median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 36.6 36.6 10 0 0
2023 54.9 18.3 15 0 0
2022 19.5 3.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · NC · Charlotte

1,452 Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZBUR 28.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JAC Logistics LLC 28.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delighted Delivery LLC 27.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZWPO 28.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2778 NC 50 South, Benson, NC 27504 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frontier Natural Gas 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iredell Operations Center 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Eastern Animal Hospital 28.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 250980-Birmingham Po 28.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZBUR 28.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Manufacturing Plant 28.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Onsite Commerical Services Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Equipment & Welding Co., Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tech Electronics of Colorado 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA-US-NY-White Plains-Tarrytown 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.