Hospitals, general medical and surgical · North Carolina

MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP

Franklin, NC · ~341 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade D.

MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP: 9.6 TCR = 127% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP safety composite

MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.9

2019→2024

MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP injury rate improved

MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP's TCR fell 18.9 from 21.8 in 2019 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 21.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=21.8 · 2020=8.4 · 2021=18.3 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Franklin, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.6 · 127% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #166/175
  • PHOTO Coastal Plaza Hospital
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~341 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coastal Plaza Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP averages 9.6 TCR (127% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP TCR series: 2019=21.8 · 2020=8.4 · 2021=18.3 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 7.5

Where MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #166 safest of 175 Hospitals, general medical and employers in North Carolina.

MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP (341 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP
MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP (341 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

MH Angel Medical Center, LLLP has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 1.3 7 0 0
2023 1.3 0.0 3 0 0
2022 4.5 2.6 7 0 0
2021 18.3 12.2 9 27 0
2020 8.4 6.4 16 1 0
2019 21.8 1.9 10 36 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · NC · Franklin

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 34 employers in Franklin, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coastal Plaza Hospital 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint Michael's Medical Center 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Joaquin General Hospital 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2004-00001450 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Raeford 341 FTE
STATE-SIZE RDU-RALEIGH-DURHAM-AIRPORT 341 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4238-162 341 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Staffing Solutions, Inc. 341 FTE
CITY-NEAR Macon County, NC 540 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1217 279 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1217 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 114 194 FTE
NAT-TCR Clover Leaf Gin, Inc. 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Curry Rail Services - Hollidaysburg 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CAS001 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Chautauqua Guest Home #2 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE EQT - Woodcliff 341 FTE
NAT-SIZE 186 - Pompano 341 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Hanover Standard Dr (1203) 341 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steffes Solutions LLC - Dickinson 341 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.