General warehousing and storage · North Carolina

M+H Fayetteville DC

Name: M+H Fayetteville DC Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Fayetteville, NC · ~118 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · September 26, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.3
Avg TCR: 5.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M+H Fayetteville DC runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

M+H Fayetteville DC: 1.3 TCR = 22% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M+H Fayetteville DC safety composite

M+H Fayetteville DC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
DART rate: C 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2017

M+H Fayetteville DC injury rate improved

M+H Fayetteville DC's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.9 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Fayetteville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 22% of ind

DART 0.7 DART
RANK #51/330
PHOTO CMOP AZ
BOOK 2y book
INJ 3 inj
SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CMOP AZ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.3
CMOP AZ

1.3
Building 57

1.3
Port logistics

1.3
ORD - Distribu

1.3

What this shows M+H Fayetteville DC averages 1.3 TCR (22% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

M+H Fayetteville DC TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=0.7 · BLS 5.8

Where M+H Fayetteville DC falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 330 General warehousing and storag employers in North Carolina.

M+H Fayetteville DC (118 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

M+H Fayetteville DC has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2017	0.7	0.7	1	0	0
2016	1.9	0.9	2	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NC · Fayetteville

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 317 employers in Fayetteville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	CMOP AZ	TUCSON, AZ	1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Building 57	STOCKTON, CA	1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Port logistics building Rancho Dominquez	RANCHO DOMINGUEZ, CA	1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	ORD - Distribution	ROSELLE, IL	1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	NorthChase Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	WILMINGTON	118 FTE
STATE-SIZE	MORRISVILLE (NCDUH)	DURHAM	118 FTE
STATE-SIZE	LSG Sky Chefs	MORRISVILLE	118 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Greenhaven Health & Rehabilitation Center	GREENSBORO	118 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cape Fear Valley Health System/Cumberland County	Fayetteville	5,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company - Fayetteville	Fayetteville	2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR	County of Cumberland	Fayetteville	2,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Goodyear Fayetteville	Fayetteville	2,044 FTE
NAT-TCR	NMHPADM06	Albuquerque, NM	1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	G4 - Broadway	New York, NY	1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Jonesboro Warehouse AK8N	Jonesboro, AR	1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Giant Eagle #3616	Pittsburgh, PA	1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	N and R of St Charles LLC	St Charles, MO	118 FTE
NAT-SIZE	N and R of Springfield East LLC	Springfield, MO	118 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Trig's Everest Metro	Weston, WI	118 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Jessicas Brick Oven	North Andover, MA	118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.