Bearings, plain (except internal combustion engine), manufacturing · Texas

Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC

Deer Park, TX · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bearings, plain (except internal combustion engine), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC: 2.6 TCR = 80% of Bearings, plain (except internal combustion engine), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC safety composite

Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC: 1.1 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2021

Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC's TCR rose 5.9 from 1.1 in 2018 to 7.0 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333613 · Deer Park, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #4/11
  • PHOTO Logan Clutch Corpora…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Logan Clutch Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC averages 2.6 TCR (80% of the Bearings, plain (except internal combustion engine), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC TCR series: 2018=1.1 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=7 · BLS 3.3

Where Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC falls in its industry

111 Bearings, plain (except intern establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 11 Bearings, plain (except intern employers in Texas.

Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC (43 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC
Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC (43 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Miba Industrial Bearings US (Hosuton) LLC has fewer employees than the Bearings, plain (except internal combust median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.0 2.3 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333613 · TX · Deer Park

111 Bearings, plain (except internal combustion engine), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 174 employers in Deer Park, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Logan Clutch Corporation 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auburn Gear, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Martin Sprocket & Gear 12 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welker Engineered Products 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timpson Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midkiff Farmers Coop 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seagraves GP Shelling Plant 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Paso Golden Peanut Treenut Pecan Shelling 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Plant Service, Inc. 3,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Plant Services, LLC 2,807 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bilfinger Inc 1,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dashiell/Dacon Corporation 1,118 FTE
NAT-TCR The Great American Home Store, II 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Blain Companies - Natchez 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4818-NH10 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 44441w - Panama City 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Richmond Industries 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knights Precast, Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capital Granite, Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bridgewater #639 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.