Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Michigan

Michigan Caterpillar Macomb

Macomb, MI · ~81 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michigan Caterpillar Macomb runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade B.

Michigan Caterpillar Macomb: 1.1 TCR = 55% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michigan Caterpillar Macomb safety composite

Michigan Caterpillar Macomb scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2021→2024

Michigan Caterpillar Macomb injury rate improved

Michigan Caterpillar Macomb's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.2 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Macomb, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.1 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/114
  • PHOTO Crown Lift Trucks Fr…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crown Lift Trucks Fresno (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Michigan Caterpillar Macomb in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michigan Caterpillar Macomb averages 1.1 TCR (55% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michigan Caterpillar Macomb TCR series: 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Michigan Caterpillar Macomb falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 114 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Michigan.

Michigan Caterpillar Macomb (81 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Michigan Caterpillar Macomb
Michigan Caterpillar Macomb (81 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Michigan Caterpillar Macomb has more employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MI · Macomb

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 50 employers in Macomb, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Fresno 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleveland Brothers Equipment Company 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cimcorp USA, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Integrated Power Services Los Angeles Service Center 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer HI-BRED INTL INC, Constantine MI 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Flint 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Detroit International Holding 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCCo-MI 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR PTI Engineered Plastics 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR Triumph Group - Macomb 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR Triumph Gear Systems 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baker Industries 260 FTE
NAT-TCR Dupuy Storage Houston, LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Addison Fresh Market, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR General Atomics - Poway - A25 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Panama Transfer Des Moines Iowa 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bay Landscaping Inc 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE V3 Construction Group 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE TopTier LLC 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE KYDOC Kentucky State Reformatory 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.